Skip to content
Legiscope
Menu
Data Privacy

GDPR Article 13: Information When Data Collected From Subject

GDPR Article 13 lists 14 mandatory information items when collecting personal data directly from data subjects. Privacy notice template and CNIL enforcement.

Also available in:Français·Polski

In one sentence. GDPR Article 13 governs what the controller must tell the data subject when collecting data directly from them: identity of controller, DPO contact, purposes and lawful basis, recipients, transfers, retention period, rights, complaint pathway, automated decision-making, and source-of-data details — at the moment of collection, in clear language. Article 14 covers the equivalent obligation when data is collected indirectly from third parties.

Article 13 is the source of every privacy notice you’ve ever read. Most CNIL sanctions for “transparency violations” cite missing Article 13 items: no DPO contact, no retention period, no mention of international transfers, no complaint pathway. The list is closed and exhaustive — every item must appear or the notice is non-compliant.

Key takeaways

  • Article 13 lists 14 mandatory information items for direct collection.
  • Information must be provided at the moment of collection — not after.
  • Each item must appear in the privacy notice or contextual disclosure (form, banner).
  • Layered notices acceptable, but the full information must be reachable in one click.
  • Article 14 covers the same obligation when data comes from a third party.

1. Article 13 mandatory items (paragraph 1)

When data is collected directly from the data subject, the controller must provide:

# Item Article
1 Identity and contact details of controller (and rep if non-EU) 13(1)(a)
2 Contact details of DPO if designated 13(1)(b)
3 Purposes of processing and the lawful basis 13(1)©
4 If basis is legitimate interest, the legitimate interest pursued 13(1)(d)
5 Recipients or categories of recipients 13(1)(e)
6 International transfers, the safeguard mechanism, how to obtain a copy 13(1)(f)

2. Additional items (paragraph 2)

To ensure fair and transparent processing:

# Item Article
7 Storage period (or criteria to determine it) 13(2)(a)
8 Existence of rights — access, rectification, erasure, restriction, object, portability 13(2)(b)
9 Right to withdraw consent (if processing based on consent) 13(2)©
10 Right to lodge a complaint with supervisory authority 13(2)(d)
11 Whether providing data is statutory / contractual requirement, and consequences of refusing 13(2)(e)
12 Existence of automated decision-making (Article 22), the logic, significance, consequences 13(2)(f)
13 Where further processing for a different purpose is planned, prior information 13(3)
14 Information already known to data subject can be omitted 13(4)

3. Layered privacy notices

The EDPB (Guidelines on transparency) endorses layered notices:

  • Layer 1: short summary at point of collection (form, banner) — controller name, key purposes, link to full notice
  • Layer 2: complete privacy notice on a dedicated page with all 14 items

Conditions:

  • Layer 1 must be complete enough for an informed decision (controller, purposes, link to layer 2)
  • Layer 2 must be one click away
  • Both layers must use clear and plain language

4. Compliant privacy notice structure

A typical Article 13-compliant privacy notice has:

1. Who we are (controller identity, address, DPO contact)
2. What data we collect
3. Why we process it (purposes + lawful bases per purpose)
4. Who receives it (internal teams + named external recipients)
5. International transfers (countries + safeguard mechanism)
6. How long we keep it (per category of data)
7. Your rights (access, rectification, erasure, etc.) — how to exercise
8. Your right to complain to the CNIL/relevant DPA (with link)
9. Required vs optional fields (consequences of refusal)
10. Automated decision-making (logic, significance, consequences) — if any
11. Last updated date + change history

5. Common Article 13 violations sanctioned by CNIL

Failure Frequency in sanctions
No DPO contact High
No retention period stated High
No mention of international transfers High
Generic “we may share with partners” without naming High
Missing complaint pathway to CNIL Medium
Lawful basis not specified per purpose Medium
Automated decision-making not disclosed Medium
Notice in legalese requiring multiple readings Medium

The CNIL’s procédure simplifiée frequently uses Article 13 violations as the lead grounds — they are visible on first inspection of the privacy notice.

6. Special cases

Mobile apps

Notice must be available before the user consents to install / first use the app. The standard practice: in-app first-launch notice + permanent link in settings.

Connected devices / IoT

Information must be provided through an accessible channel — companion app, paper insert, QR code linking to web notice.

Forms (paper or digital)

Notice in proximity to the form fields, not buried in terms of service. CNIL has sanctioned forms where the notice was a separate document the user never saw.

7. Article 13 vs Article 14: when each applies

Source of data Article applies Trigger
Directly from data subject 13 At the moment of collection
Indirectly from a third party 14 Within reasonable period, no later than 1 month, OR at first communication, OR when first disclosed to another recipient

If your processing involves both — most do — both articles apply.

8. Exemptions (Article 13(4))

The notice obligation doesn’t apply where the data subject already has the information. The bar for “already has” is high — generic awareness doesn’t count. The controller must be able to demonstrate the data subject has actually received the specific information.

In practice: the exemption applies in narrow cases (e.g., a returning customer who recently received an updated notice). Don’t rely on this exemption broadly.

9. Enforcement

Year Sanction Article 13 violation
2019 Google (CNIL) — €50M Information not easily accessible
2021 WhatsApp Ireland (DPC) — €225M Inadequate transparency
2022 Discord (CNIL) — €800K Insufficient retention period information
2023 Brico Privé (CNIL) — €50K Multiple Article 13 omissions
2024 Several SMB sanctions €5K-€50K each Missing DPO contact, vague lawful basis

Article 83(5)(b) places Article 13 violations at the top tier — up to €20M or 4% of global turnover.

10. Tooling

Official sources: Article 13 (information to be provided) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on EUR-Lex, the EDPB guidelines, recommendations and best practices register, and the ICO guidance.

Conclusion

Article 13 is the contract between the controller and the data subject at the moment of collection. The 14 items are not optional. The notice doesn’t need to be long — it needs to be complete, clear, and accessible. Most violations are omissions, not active misrepresentations: build a checklist once, audit notices quarterly.

FAQ

What information must I include in a privacy notice under GDPR Article 13?

14 items: controller identity, DPO contact, purposes and lawful basis, recipients, international transfers, retention period, rights (access, rectification, erasure, restriction, objection, portability), withdrawal of consent, complaint to supervisory authority, statutory/contractual requirements, automated decision-making, further-processing notice, source-of-data details.

When must Article 13 information be provided?

At the moment data is collected from the data subject — not after. For online forms, the notice must be available before the user submits. For mobile apps, before first use.

Can I use a layered privacy notice?

Yes. The EDPB endorses layered notices — short summary at point of collection + full notice one click away. Both layers must use clear and plain language. The summary alone is not enough.

What’s the difference between Articles 13 and 14?

Article 13 covers data collected directly from the data subject. Article 14 covers data collected indirectly (from third parties, public sources, partners). The information items are largely the same but timing differs.

Are there exemptions to Article 13?

Article 13(4) exempts the obligation where the data subject already has the information. The bar is high — generic awareness doesn’t count. Don’t rely on this exemption broadly.

L
Written by
Legiscope
Legiscope

Put this guidance into operation

See how Legiscope connects privacy records, source material and review-controlled work.

Book a tailored demo
Continue reading

Related articles

01Data Privacy

Australia–EU Data Transfers: Adequacy Status and SCCs

Australia does not hold an EU adequacy decision. Verified against the European Commission's published list of adequacy decisions on 30 July 2026. Australia has never held one, is not the subject of…

July 30, 2026
02Data Privacy

BCR vs SCC vs DPF: Choosing the Right GDPR Transfer Mechanism

GDPR Article 46 lists multiple safeguards for international data transfers. Three dominate practice: Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), and the EU-U.S. Data Privacy…

April 30, 2026
03Data Privacy

Best DPO Software 2026: Internal & Outsourced DPOs

The DPO role is defined by Art. 37-39 GDPR, and the EDPB made it a 2023 coordinated-enforcement priority — so the software a DPO uses is now itself an accountability signal.

July 7, 2026
04Data Privacy

Best GDPR Compliance Software: 6 Tools Compared + Pricing 2026

Choosing the right GDPR compliance software is no longer optional for small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the EU. Data protection authorities across Europe have shifted enforcement focus…

March 28, 2026
05Data Privacy

Canada-EU Data Transfers: Adequacy Scope and SCCs

Canada is one of the few countries the European Commission has recognised as offering adequate protection, and it is the country where that recognition is most often over-read. The decision is…

July 30, 2026
06Data Privacy

Cassie (Syrenis) Alternatives & Comparison 2026

For a regulated-industry DPO, that distinction is the whole decision. Consent is one lawful basis under Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR; a compliance program is everything around it.

July 9, 2026
07Data Privacy

Consent Management Platforms Compared (2026)

Choosing the right consent management platform is one of the most consequential technical decisions an organisation makes for privacy compliance. A poorly configured CMP exposes you to enforcement…

March 28, 2026
08Data Privacy

Cookie Audit: How to Map Your Website's Cookies

A cookie audit is the foundational step for any website's GDPR and ePrivacy compliance. Without a complete, documented inventory of every cookie and tracking technology deployed on your site, your…

March 28, 2026